Top

Poetry and Grammar

April 7, 2008 · Written by Melissa Donovan

grammar
Creative Commons License photo credit: KatieKrueger

Good writers respect grammar the way an acrobat respects the tightrope. Grammar might be intimidating and complicated, but we need it in order to perform. Grammar lends structure and clarity to our craft and gives us common ground rules that we use to communicate clearly and effectively. Just as the acrobat uses the tightrope to traverse great heights, writers use grammar to traverse language.

Many poets demonstrate grammatical expertise, neatly parking periods and commas in their designated spaces and paying homage to proper capitalization. Consider the following poem and how it follows the rules of grammar. Note that in poetry writing, the traditional rule is that the first letter of each line is capitalized regardless of whether or not it starts a new sentence.

Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers

Aunt Jennifer’s tigers prance across a screen,
Bright topaz denizens of a world of green.
They do not fear the men beneath the tree;
They pace in sleek chivalric certainty.

Aunt Jennifer’s finger fluttering through her wool
Find even the ivory needle hard to pull.
The massive weight of Uncle’s wedding band
Sits heavily upon Aunt Jennifer’s hand.

When Aunt is dead, her terrified hands will lie
Still ringed with ordeals she was mastered by.
The tigers in the panel that she made
Will go on prancing, proud and unafraid.

-Adrienne Rich

Poets don’t always follow the rules, which is why poetry is attractive to writers who are extra creative and enjoy coloring outside the lines. Grammar, particularly spelling and punctuation, is nothing more than a creative tool for many poets who choose to dismiss them altogether or use the them to decorate and add aesthetic elements to a piece. Many poets have skirted grammar with great success. Many more have failed. E.E. Cummings is well known for giving grammar the proverbial finger but he takes his anarchy one step further and actually alters basic sentence structure, and manages to do so quite effectively.

anyone lived in a pretty how town

anyone lived in a pretty how town
(with up so floating many bells down)
spring summer autumn winter
he sang his didn’t he danced his did.

Women and men (both little and small)
cared for anyone not at all
they sowed their isn’t they reaped their same
sun moon stars rain

children guessed (but only a few
and down they forgot as up they grew
autumn winter spring summer)
that noone loved him more by more

when by now and tree by leaf
she laughed his joy she cried his grief
bird by snow and stir by still
anyone’s any was all to her

someones married their everyones
laughed their cryings and did their dance
(sleep wake hope and then)they
said their nevers they slept their dream

stars rain sun moon
(and only the snow can begin to explain
how children are apt to forget to remember
with up so floating many bells down)

one day anyone died i guess
(and noone stooped to kiss his face)
busy folk buried them side by side
little by little and was by was

all by all and deep by deep
and more by more they dream their sleep
noone and anyone earth by april
with by spirit and if by yes.

Women and men (both dong and ding)
summer autumn winter spring
reaped their sowing and went their came
sun moon stars rain

-ee cummings

Cummings has dismissed capital letters altogether and he uses punctuation seemingly at random. Yet the poem works. Imagine it with the proper grammar rules applied and you’ll quickly realize that his way is more effective for the piece.

As the poetry canon grows beyond measure, poets increasingly reach for creative devices to make their work stand out. Toying with grammar is one such device, but it is not something that can be approached carelessly. If you choose to forgo grammar because you don’t know it rather than as a creative method, it will show and the poem will present as amateurish. Of course, that’s true for all types of writing. Learn the rules, then break them.

I salute anyone who breaks the rules in the interest of writing great poetry just as much as I admire poets who craft meter and verse within the confines of traditional grammar. So for this poetry-loving writer and blogger, either way is the right way. Walk the tight rope or jump from it and see if you can fly.

Email this article to a friend
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Comments

2 Responses to “Poetry and Grammar”
  1. Deb says:

    I have chosen to be indifferent to punctuation and spelling and grammar where poetry is concerned. I have sat through the usual required sessions in poetry in high school but promptly forgot the material as soon as the grades were posted. I have always felt that while poets do need to communicate their ideas effectively rigid rules do not always accomplish that objective.

    In my own poetic struggles I dismiss the rules and seek to find the words and rhythm that convey the spirit of what is on my heart. Should I decide later that actually publishing anything is worth pursuing I can always get a coach to help clean it up for the masses later. Hm, I didn’t realize I was in such a snarky mood today so please don’t take it personally.

  2. @Deb (gscottage), I am pretty indifferent to grammar in poetry myself. Either way works, which is why poetry is more an art form that most other types of writing. And please feel free to snark away. I encourage friendly debate and opposing viewpoints. Makes things interesting!

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


A Creative Writing Blog


Writing Forward is a creative writing blog that publishes news and information for writers. Get writing tips and ideas, writing exercises, and be a part of this supportive writing community by subscribing and leaving comments. And keep on writing!

Bottom