<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Plural or Possessed? When to Use Apostrophe -S</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-grammar/apostrophe-s/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:43:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-31308</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-31308</guid>
		<description>Hi R.S. I appreciate your input, but it&#039;s not quite accurate. &lt;em&gt;The Chicago Manual of Style&lt;/em&gt; specifically provides the following examples for possessives: Kansas&#039;s legislature, Burns&#039;s poems, Strauss&#039;s Vienna, Dickens&#039;s novels, etc. There are exceptions, notably for names &quot;of two or more syllables that end in an &lt;em&gt;eez&lt;/em&gt; sound.&quot; Examples include the following: Euripides&#039; tragedies, the Ganges&#039; source, Xerxes&#039; armies. Interestingly, this style guide also notes that both of the following are correct: for Jesus&#039; sake (and) Jesus&#039;s contemporaries.

You&#039;ll notice that the rule is derived from pronunciation. If you add and pronounce &quot;-ess&quot; at the end of a possessive word (to indicate possession), then it takes the apostrophe-s, even if already ends with an s. 

Writing &quot;Chris&#039;s shoe&quot; is therefore correct. However, there may be other style guides that use different standards. Again, this is more of a style issue than a hard and fast grammar rule, but I think we should strive to write in a manner that reflects pronunciation (whenever possible), which is why I support the rules set forth by both &lt;em&gt;Chicago&lt;/em&gt; and Strunk &amp; White.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi R.S. I appreciate your input, but it&#8217;s not quite accurate. <em>The Chicago Manual of Style</em> specifically provides the following examples for possessives: Kansas&#8217;s legislature, Burns&#8217;s poems, Strauss&#8217;s Vienna, Dickens&#8217;s novels, etc. There are exceptions, notably for names &#8220;of two or more syllables that end in an <em>eez</em> sound.&#8221; Examples include the following: Euripides&#8217; tragedies, the Ganges&#8217; source, Xerxes&#8217; armies. Interestingly, this style guide also notes that both of the following are correct: for Jesus&#8217; sake (and) Jesus&#8217;s contemporaries.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice that the rule is derived from pronunciation. If you add and pronounce &#8220;-ess&#8221; at the end of a possessive word (to indicate possession), then it takes the apostrophe-s, even if already ends with an s. </p>
<p>Writing &#8220;Chris&#8217;s shoe&#8221; is therefore correct. However, there may be other style guides that use different standards. Again, this is more of a style issue than a hard and fast grammar rule, but I think we should strive to write in a manner that reflects pronunciation (whenever possible), which is why I support the rules set forth by both <em>Chicago</em> and Strunk &amp; White.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.S</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-31307</link>
		<dc:creator>R.S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-31307</guid>
		<description>When something ends with an &quot;s&quot; and it&#039;s a belonging, you should put s&#039;.
Your example for: Chris&#039; shoe is correct. 

It cannot be &quot;Chris&#039;s shoe&quot; because then that would be &quot;Chris is shoe&quot;.

Hope that helped ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When something ends with an &#8220;s&#8221; and it&#8217;s a belonging, you should put s&#8217;.<br />
Your example for: Chris&#8217; shoe is correct. </p>
<p>It cannot be &#8220;Chris&#8217;s shoe&#8221; because then that would be &#8220;Chris is shoe&#8221;.</p>
<p>Hope that helped <img src='http://www.writingforward.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-26961</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-26961</guid>
		<description>Yep, you&#039;re right. It should be Men&#039;s Department because it&#039;s possessive (the department belongs to the men). However, the Juniors Department could go either way. Here&#039;s why: The word &quot;Juniors&quot; could be functioning as a modifier (adjective) describing what type of department it is -- it&#039;s a Juniors Department. It&#039;s plural because it&#039;s for all juniors (not just one). On the other hand, you could say it&#039;s like the Men&#039;s Department and &lt;em&gt;belongs&lt;/em&gt; to the juniors. Now, if it belongs to all the juniors, it should be Juniors&#039; Department. If it belongs to just one junior, it should be Junior&#039;s Department. Tough call. I think the best way would be Juniors&#039; Department. In a department store, Juniors&#039; Department and Men&#039;s Department would be consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, you&#8217;re right. It should be Men&#8217;s Department because it&#8217;s possessive (the department belongs to the men). However, the Juniors Department could go either way. Here&#8217;s why: The word &#8220;Juniors&#8221; could be functioning as a modifier (adjective) describing what type of department it is &#8212; it&#8217;s a Juniors Department. It&#8217;s plural because it&#8217;s for all juniors (not just one). On the other hand, you could say it&#8217;s like the Men&#8217;s Department and <em>belongs</em> to the juniors. Now, if it belongs to all the juniors, it should be Juniors&#8217; Department. If it belongs to just one junior, it should be Junior&#8217;s Department. Tough call. I think the best way would be Juniors&#8217; Department. In a department store, Juniors&#8217; Department and Men&#8217;s Department would be consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuckster</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-26951</link>
		<dc:creator>chuckster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-26951</guid>
		<description>What do you use for a retail dept sign?

Mens  or Men&#039;s

Juniors  or Junior&#039;s

If the sign says Men&#039;s Dept.  then I understand the use of the apostrophe, but when just the word MENS  is used there is a debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you use for a retail dept sign?</p>
<p>Mens  or Men&#8217;s</p>
<p>Juniors  or Junior&#8217;s</p>
<p>If the sign says Men&#8217;s Dept.  then I understand the use of the apostrophe, but when just the word MENS  is used there is a debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-24229</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-24229</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I hope you continue to find it helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I hope you continue to find it helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shake</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-24143</link>
		<dc:creator>Shake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-24143</guid>
		<description>This actually clears up a bit, I&#039;m bookmarking the site now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This actually clears up a bit, I&#8217;m bookmarking the site now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millar prescott</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>millar prescott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I just found your site via BlogRush. Excellent. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found your site via BlogRush. Excellent. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 06:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article!

One of my pet peeves is when people do these thing incorrectly...such dolts.

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article!</p>
<p>One of my pet peeves is when people do these thing incorrectly&#8230;such dolts.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the double-s ending.  That would require adding an -es to the end of course.  A good thing to keep in mind, and I will for when this article is updated.

When a name ends in &quot;s,&quot; you would normally show possession by adding the apostrophe-s ending.  The exception is for classical and biblical names such as Jesus and Moses, which would appear as Jesus&#039; and Moses&#039;.

As for what I think... I think Chris&#039;s shoe looks and sounds better than Chris&#039; shoe.  You&#039;re going to pronounce that possessive &quot;s&quot; so you might as well write it out.

Jim and Brent, thanks for visiting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the double-s ending.  That would require adding an -es to the end of course.  A good thing to keep in mind, and I will for when this article is updated.</p>
<p>When a name ends in &#8220;s,&#8221; you would normally show possession by adding the apostrophe-s ending.  The exception is for classical and biblical names such as Jesus and Moses, which would appear as Jesus&#8217; and Moses&#8217;.</p>
<p>As for what I think&#8230; I think Chris&#8217;s shoe looks and sounds better than Chris&#8217; shoe.  You&#8217;re going to pronounce that possessive &#8220;s&#8221; so you might as well write it out.</p>
<p>Jim and Brent, thanks for visiting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrentD</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>BrentD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I was taught in high school that in the case of a word ending in s pluralization is shown by an apostrophe following the s.

Such as &quot;It was Chris&#039; shoe.&quot;

Imagine my surprise when upon entering college after a long hiatus, my professor instructed me to use an apostrophe s.

Such as &quot;It was Chris&#039;s shoe.&quot;

It still seems weird to me. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was taught in high school that in the case of a word ending in s pluralization is shown by an apostrophe following the s.</p>
<p>Such as &#8220;It was Chris&#8217; shoe.&#8221;</p>
<p>Imagine my surprise when upon entering college after a long hiatus, my professor instructed me to use an apostrophe s.</p>
<p>Such as &#8220;It was Chris&#8217;s shoe.&#8221;</p>
<p>It still seems weird to me. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.writingforward.com/grammar/punctuation-marks/apostrophe-s/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingforward.com/?p=32#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Nice wee article. The one thing I would have added is what to do when the noun ends in an s, or a double-s, like &#039;princess&#039;. This is covered quite nicely in the Wikipedia article under the subheading: Singular nouns ending in s, z, or x.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice wee article. The one thing I would have added is what to do when the noun ends in an s, or a double-s, like &#8216;princess&#8217;. This is covered quite nicely in the Wikipedia article under the subheading: Singular nouns ending in s, z, or x.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
